Comments on: The Great Vs. Resolution #27: X-Statix http://casualvs.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/the-great-vs-resolution-27-x-statix/ Featuring the Great Vs. Resolution, 57 mono-affiliate decks in 52 weeks Sun, 16 Nov 2008 06:00:38 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: The Great Vs. Resolution #28: Crime Lords « Planet Kalee http://casualvs.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/the-great-vs-resolution-27-x-statix/#comment-642 The Great Vs. Resolution #28: Crime Lords « Planet Kalee Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:51:58 +0000 http://casualvs.wordpress.com/?p=269#comment-642 [...] Planet Kalee Featuring the Great Vs. Resolution, 57 mono-affiliate decks in 52 weeks « The Great Vs. Resolution #27: X-Statix [...] [...] Planet Kalee Featuring the Great Vs. Resolution, 57 mono-affiliate decks in 52 weeks « The Great Vs. Resolution #27: X-Statix [...]

]]> By: kaleeshwarrior http://casualvs.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/the-great-vs-resolution-27-x-statix/#comment-641 kaleeshwarrior Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:13:22 +0000 http://casualvs.wordpress.com/?p=269#comment-641 I chose Galactus for a few reasons. First, is the rules of the Resolution says to try and stay in-universe which means Imperiex would break two rules (doesn't have X-Statix affiliation + isn't Marvel) vs. Galactus's one (not X-Statix). Second, I've played Statix just enough to know that both you and your opponent are going to have a nice chunk of life at the end of the game. By using Galactus you can do the sap and swap and should be sitting on a nice endurance difference. Finally, Imperiex requires odd-initiatives plus a board clear to be most useful which isn't always possible. I've rarely missed Zeitgeist with two copies although that's a recent change to the list. If I felt like I had more room, I'd definitely include at least one more copy. I chose Galactus for a few reasons. First, is the rules of the Resolution says to try and stay in-universe which means Imperiex would break two rules (doesn’t have X-Statix affiliation + isn’t Marvel) vs. Galactus’s one (not X-Statix). Second, I’ve played Statix just enough to know that both you and your opponent are going to have a nice chunk of life at the end of the game. By using Galactus you can do the sap and swap and should be sitting on a nice endurance difference. Finally, Imperiex requires odd-initiatives plus a board clear to be most useful which isn’t always possible.

I’ve rarely missed Zeitgeist with two copies although that’s a recent change to the list. If I felt like I had more room, I’d definitely include at least one more copy.

]]> By: kamiza http://casualvs.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/the-great-vs-resolution-27-x-statix/#comment-640 kamiza Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:55:35 +0000 http://casualvs.wordpress.com/?p=269#comment-640 He should definitely be in there instead of Galactus. BTW - Zeitgeist should always be at least a three-of. He's far too important to risk missing. Otherwise, superb stuff. He should definitely be in there instead of Galactus. BTW – Zeitgeist should always be at least a three-of. He’s far too important to risk missing. Otherwise, superb stuff.

]]> By: scottkthompson http://casualvs.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/the-great-vs-resolution-27-x-statix/#comment-639 scottkthompson Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:18:00 +0000 http://casualvs.wordpress.com/?p=269#comment-639 Would Imperiex allow you stay inside the guidelines of the challenge, or are unaffiliateds a no-go? Would Imperiex allow you stay inside the guidelines of the challenge, or are unaffiliateds a no-go?

]]>